The accused argued the trial judge mishandled a witness who needed special caution, that new bail documents showed a motive to lie, and that the verdict was unreasonable. The court rejected all three, and left open whether the Vetrovec caution applies in sexual offence cases at all.
R v McFadden, 2026 MBCA 86, 2026 MBCA 86 · Manitoba · Fresh evidence, Unreasonable verdict
A seven judge majority held the trial judge should have kept Awale Hussein's youth findings and violent convictions from the jury. Yet the evidence on identity and intent was so strong that the Court applied the curative proviso and dismissed the appeal.
R. v. Hussein, 2026 SCC 2 · Ontario · Trial judge error
Matthew Berg argued the trial judge rejected his evidence simply because he believed the complainant. The Supreme Court of Canada found no error on these facts, but used the case to say that a conviction can never rest only on accepting the complainant's account.
R. v. Berg, 2026 SCC 21 · Saskatchewan
General information, not legal advice. 120 lessons and 40 grounds so far, each with its authority.